jueves, 28 de abril de 2011

Formalist vs Realist

1) What are realistic films supposed to reproduce?
 
nTries to represent real life
nReal camera angles (shoulder height for example)
nReal camera movement (neck moving)
nNo non-diagetic sounds
nNatural light
 
2) Why are formalist films stylistically flamboyant?
 
nDirector tries to create an emotion or make it flow.
nTry to show us all perspective of any scene.
nExpress as much as they can, they try to send a message via emotions created by them.
 
3) Why are formalist directors referred to as expressionists?
 
nBecause they express more than show something historical or realistic in a film.
nThey try to express a feeling.
nThey take a lot of what can be called surrealist in order to show the feeling they want to show.
 
4) Why would realists be more concerned with psychological truths?
 
nBecause they try to tell something more real life.
nThey want to show life how it is, so they focus on real life effects.
nThey try to look as natural as possible so it expresses the truth of actual life.
 
Example 1: Evil Dead 2 (1987) by Sam Raimi – “Groovy” scene
 
nIt is a montage (various shots, heavy editing).
nFlamboyant, to create a adrenaline effect.
nFocuses on trying to show the determination of the character.
nNon-diagetic sound, creates tension and shows determination.
 
Example 2: Shaun of the Dead (2004) by Edgar Wright – “Don’t stop me now” scene
 
nDiagetic sound is used as a non-diagetic, showing the humor in the scene.
nQuick editing to show all the actions happening
nMovement is coordinated with non-diagetic, to create a more comical effect.
nTries to show the despair of the characters, without losing the humor, so it keeps their despaired expressions while keep the music for the comical value.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario